After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these systems. Coming from lie recognition tools analyzed at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilized for asylum applications. This article is exploring how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-consultation/ of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs all their capacity to get around these devices and to follow their legal right for protection.
It also shows how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from opening the stations of protection. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: while they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.